> >>A. Is this the files or just the way the positioning of the META tags are in the HTML code it writes >> (you had a referance to this in one of your articles)? > Either way, you are doomed. FP will REWRITE YOUR HTML TO SUIT ITSELF EVERY TIME YOU LOAD A PAGE TO >EDIT. No matter what you have at the start, you have to do it their way or not at all. > And, if you find an ISP runnning the FrontPage extensions that will make your pages usable, there >are serious security problems with the way it assigns permissions when new users are set up. > >>B. Do you have a favorite HTML editor. > I use several, depending on the size of the job: >HTMLNotepad for quick edits on small files >Microsoft Word when I have a lot of formatting to do, with the coding set up in macros > (macros available on request) >AMAYA (an editor/browser experiment from W3.org) that shows structure, for fixing problems.
>>C. How much ease of use am I going to loose with another editor? > The WYSIWYG editors give the illusion of being easy, but they can do dreadful things to your >code without your noticing. I think HoTMetaL gives you the ability to see their tags, but as >I recall, it inserts invalid (non-standard) things to support its WYSIWIG display. > Editing raw HTML code isn't that hard - except for complex tables.