---

[ August Full List | Post A Reply ]

---

Re: CGI From Kelly on 20 August '02 replying to Re: CGI posted by Nicholas >> >>EARTHLINK CLICK-N-BUILD >> >>Im trying to inform myself so as to create a website. Hoping this >>makes sense. It appears that CGI is not a good thing. Is this >>what I would have/end up with by choosing Earthlinks Click-N- >>Build? > >There is nothing wrong with CGI per se. On the contrary, using >CGI puts the processing burden on the server -- where it belongs, >IMO -- instead of trying to use JavaScript and other "client- >side" code to shift the processing burden to the visitor. > >OTOH -- while I know nothing of Earthlink's "Click-N-Build" -- >each and every "build it in minutes" tool I've ever seen was an >absolute disaster, resulting in buggy sites and pathetic search >engine rankings. Thank you for the response/info kelly

Your Reply
>>> >>>EARTHLINK CLICK-N-BUILD >>> >>>Im trying to inform myself so as to create a website. Hoping this >>>makes sense. It appears that CGI is not a good thing. Is this >>>what I would have/end up with by choosing Earthlinks Click-N- >>>Build? >> >>There is nothing wrong with CGI per se. On the contrary, using >>CGI puts the processing burden on the server -- where it belongs, >>IMO -- instead of trying to use JavaScript and other "client- >>side" code to shift the processing burden to the visitor. >> >>OTOH -- while I know nothing of Earthlink's "Click-N-Build" -- >>each and every "build it in minutes" tool I've ever seen was an >>absolute disaster, resulting in buggy sites and pathetic search >>engine rankings. > >Thank you for the response/info >kelly
*Your name:
*Message subject:
Home page title:
Home page URL:
Email:	(if you'd like to receive automatic replies by email)